to identify what is best practice. This article is a step-by step-approach to critiquing quantitative research to help nurses demystify the process and decode the. Running head: ARTICLE CRITIQUE. 1 Article Critique. Graduate student Significant results were noted in the results of this study, but there are limitations to. Here is a really good example of a scholary research critique written by a student in EDRS The student who submitted this paper last semester earned a. Is the educational significance of the problem discussed? Reading a single article can act as a springboard into researching the topic more widely and aids in ensuring your nursing practice remains current resdarch is supported by existing literature. Results 1. It should both contain and justify the exact specifications of selection criteria, sample size, response rate and any statistics used. Here's How. Was this click here helpful? How writing a good argumentative essay Critique resezrch Research Article. Graphs and tables should be clear and promote clarity of the text. Thesis Statement. Sarah Vogel Visit Sarah Vogel specialises in producing well researched articles in the field of health and medicine. Review of Related Literature. Did the researcher discuss or account for any potentially confounding variables that he or she was unable to control for? What is are the research question s or hypothesis? Your thesis should briefly sum up the main points of your critique. This is a long list of questions. Organize your paper carefully and be careful not to jump around from one argument to the next. Instruments 1. Were there threats to the reliability and validity of the study and were these controlled for? Performing your own critical analysis of an article allows you to consider its value to you and to your workplace. Click here to see a an example this is how you start of a research critique. Sarah Vogel specialises in producing well researched here in the field of health and medicine. In this section, you should provide your critique of the article. Are the instruments appropriate for measuring the intended variables? While these tips are designed to help students writing a psychology critique paper, many of the same principles apply to writing critiques in other subject areas as well. Consider whether:. Are the tests of significance interpreted using the appropriate degrees of freedom? Another alternative is to point out questions that the researchers failed to answer in the discussion section. What type of research is this? Your critique paper should end with an articpe of the articles argument, your conclusions and your reactions. Thanks for your feedback! Discussion Conclusions and Recommendation. Following artticle the list of criteria to evaluate critique a research article. Are the tables and figures if any well organized and see more to understand? How to Write a Psychology Research Paper. An easy read. This will demonstrate how the study is capable of achieving its aims. Is each result discussed in terms of the original hypothesis to which it relates? Is evidence presented that indicates that each instrument is appropriate for the sample under study? While these tips are designed to help students writing a psychology critique paper, many of the same principles apply to writing critiques in other subject areas as well. If a trial was undertaken, was it randomised, case controlled, blinded or double-blinded? If you feel that the researchers are incorrect or off-base, point out problems with the conclusions and suggest alternative explanations. Review of Related Literature 1. Critical evaluation is defined as a systematic way of considering the truthfulness of a piece of research, the results and how relevant and applicable they are. How to Critique a Research Article. If a sample was selected, more info the method of selecting the sample clearly described? Thanks for your feedback! Document CPD. Materials and Methods Similar to a recipe, the description of materials and how to critique a research article will allow others to replicate the study elsewhere if needed. Hypotheses 1. Please note that you should first summarize the paper and then evaluate different parts of it. Have the references been critically analyzed and the results of learn more here studies compared and contrasted, i. Keywords Three to six keywords that encapsulate the main topics of the research will have been drawn from the body of the article. Focus instead on giving the reader an overall idea of the content of the article. If an instrument was developed specifically for the study, are administration, scoring or tabulating, and interpretation procedures fully described? Sarah Vogel Visit Sarah Vogel specialises in producing well researched articles in the field of health and medicine. These should be clearly stated and will only be valid if the study was reliable, valid and used a representative sample size. Your thesis statement is the main idea of your critique. Did the results support their hypothesis? Are the suggestions for future action based on practical significance or on statistical. Tips for Writing Great Psychology Papers. Were there threats to the reliability and validity of the study and were these controlled for? Are the data in each table and figure described in the text? Reading scientific articles yo be difficult. Describe the reliability and validity of all the instruments used. Articls here to see a an example this is how you start of a research critique. Published: 06 October Are recommendations for future research made? Argue one point at a time. Learn more about how to read and understand psychology journal articles. Describe the sample used in this study. Hypotheses 1. Is each instrument described in terms of purpose and content? Be careful not to get too bogged down by your summary. Is the educational significance of the problem discussed? Consider whether:. Are all cited references relevant to the problem under investigation? What is are the research question s continue reading hypothesis? Start a subscription today! What are your concerns? Your critique might focus on problems with critiqur authors argument, presentation or on information, and alternatives that have been overlooked. It hhow not introduce any new material, but should address how the aims of the study have rsearch met. The discussion section offers crktique a good opportunity to take a position. When necessary, are agticle directly or operationally defined? Another alternative is to point out questions that the researchers failed to answer in the discussion section. Consider whether: There were any major omissions in the results, which could indicate bias Percentages have been used to disguise small sample sizes The data generated is consistent with the data collected Negative results are just as relevant as research that produces positive results but as mentioned previously may be omitted in publication due to editorial bias. Have you ever wondered what your personality type means? Surely the article will be of good quality if it has made it through the peer review process? Is the educational significance of the problem discussed? Reading scientific articles can be difficult. Publication bias can occur when editors only accept manuscripts that have a bearing on the direction of their own research, or reject manuscripts with negative findings. While these tips are designed to help students writing a psychology critique paper, many of the same principles apply to writing critiques in other subject areas as well. Instruments 1.